MAKE AN IMPACT. VOLUNTEER. CLICK HERE TO SIGN UP

YGMedia

About YG Media

This author has not yet filled in any details.
So far YG Media has created 122 blog entries.

PHOTO ESSAY: Y&G 2019

By Elijah Merritt

Legislative

Delegate Jayden Hansen of the White Rock YMCA (far left) speaking on behalf of his bill that expresses that the “top dog” will be taken out of school through the implementation of K-12 school, which in the delegate’s eyes, will prevent bullying due to older and more mature students being around the younger ones.

In the photo above Delegate Adrian Kingori of the McKinney YMCA (far right) objects.

“I don’t believe high school students will have positive impacts on younger kids,” Adrian said.

He goes on to explain how combining middle and high schools would not eliminate the so-called “top dogs,” but they put 12th graders in an environment where the 8th graders were once at the top. It becomes apparent to not only this delegate but others as well that adding more students on top of an elementary or middle school, wouldn’t benefit taking down the top dog.

To start the day off, Delegate Veronica Singh of the Plano Family YMCA (middle) presented a bill that would affect the productivity of students throughout their school day. Veronica constructed a bill about excessive cell phone usage in schools, and how it, “doesn’t promote learning.”

She explains how the negatives outweigh the positives when it comes to cell phone usage in schools, including how cell phones and other technology distracts the students to a point where it delays their learning. One resolution that she has for this issue is that not only the students but teachers should also be punished to a degree when it comes to these instances of technology use. Based off of personal experience, Veronica has seen first hand how technology use can disrupt learning environments, and her passion for the topic is why she has come up with the idea to implement this bill.

Although there were some opponent speakers who did dispute the delegates point of view, it was more positively received than it was negatively received, and it showed due to the majority vote in favor of having her bill advance.

Delegate Brayden Miller (middle), from Liberty High School in Frisco, whose bill pertains to the inclusion of self-defense in P.E. curriculums in schools throughout the state of Texas.

The delegate describes the situations in which youths and children have been harmed, including physical harm such as being raped, and how it happens so often due to so many people not knowing how to properly protect themselves.

Miller believes in students being able to defend themselves affirmatively, through confidence and body language. Although being able to fight back physically has always been an option, this delegate believes that violence is not the only way, and through his research, he has found that a majority of the students who take classes in self-defense were successfully able to defend themselves. Without assistance from anyone else.

One of his points is that these self-defense classes should be integrated into current physical education courses, which would not be taking away from, the students learning, allowing them to maximize their education.

Hyde House

Delegate Sanjana Danau (middle) from Liberty High School presented a bill that stating that women should be charged with child endangerment if they abuse any kinds of alcohol while pregnant.

One of her goals was to try and make sure that no child is born with any diseases due to the mother’s alcohol consumption, which was supported by many of the delegates.

“Any form of alcohol and/or drugs ingested during pregnancy is harmful,” Danau said. But in case of malicious prosecution related to drugs it is the right of people to consult attorney’s defense for a drug charge as they can defend the case.

Although there was a debate that consisted of many disagreeances, the bill advanced by four votes.

Students break after a long hour of bill presentations and lively debate.

Delegate Yuval Marom (middle) from Centennial High School believes that high schools need to have finance classes to help students control their finances. The delegate explains how these courses would be mandatory, and a test will be given in order to see how far the students progress over the year.

“This is the year that students are about to leave and go into college and deal with these financial troubles,” Marom said.

The delegate wants to implement this in order to have these soon to be high school graduates prepared, and through this, they will be able to finance properly, rather than mismanaging their money.

Due to running behind schedule, it was brought to the delegates’ attention that they would need to pick things up if they wanted to get through more bills. A delegate had the idea to have question lines rather than individually asking for permission to speak, and that idea was voted majority “I.” This allowed more delegates have the chance to speak up, as long as they held their spot in line, and more feedback is given by more people, rather than the same ones who were quick to stand up and ask for permission.

The Capital

The 72nd Youth and Government State Conference held District Court and Legislative sessions at the Texas State Capitol.

Located in the Capitol, there is a showcase of different Medal of Honor recipients. The Medal of Honor is the highest US military decoration awarded by Congress to a member of the armed forces, and as seen here, many of the recipients come from Texas.

The United States flag and the Texas flag flew at full mast during the Youth and Government State Conference. Both signify unity both in state and country. The Youth and Government program is to prepare the students for the world of tomorrow, and better educate them about the different types of government systems including Legislation, Judiciary, State Affairs, and Media.

2022-08-09T02:42:34-05:00January 26th, 2019|Uncategorized|0 Comments

PHOTO ESSAY: Y&G District Court

By Nathan Henderson

A legal driver?

Introduction  An essay consisting of photos by Nathan Henderson. All of the photos were taken at the Texas State Capitol during the 2019 YMCA State Conference. The photos illustrate the events of district court during the conference.

Description  The battle of the attorneys culminates with the State vs Cameron Shepard at YMCA District Court on Friday. The case debates an intoxication manslaughter charge against Cameron Shepard for the death of Chassidy Barnes in a car accident.And people need not worry about establishing or modifying a trust as there are many attorneys to help.

Overview Expert lawyers like the lawyers for injury claims in Katy says that the scope of the case describes the trial of a fatality accident. The case states that on the night of June 30, 2018, Chassidy Barnes was killed in a accident where drinking was involved. Those involved were Cameron Shepard, the driver, Taylor Belanger, and Chassidy Barnes. Various witnesses were called to the stand to give their account of the events or give expert analysis of the accident. If you are injured in an accident, you can get compensation after car accident with the help of an experienced lawyer.

Officer Jordan Cole Officer Jordan Cole was a first responder on the scene of the accident. He also performed a roadside alcohol test on Cameron Shepard at the scene of the crash. Cole said that Shepard was most likely intoxicated at the scene of the crash. Shepard  “refused to take one of the tests, as well as having increasingly blinking eyes.”  The prosecution used officer Cole to illustrate the fact that Cameron Shepard was intoxicated at the time of driving. If accidents happen due to drink and drive, DUI lawyer practicing in Colorado can be checked out! 

Working at Austin General Hospital, Emery Payne drew the blood of Shepard at the direction of Officer Jordan Cole. Payne described Cole as “calm, compliant, and quiet.” Even with his attitude pointing towards another ruling, Payne came to the verdict that Shepard was drunk. The prosecution used Payne as a vital witness to prove their case against Shepard.  

Imani Haynes Imani Haynes was a “68 year old young” woman who directly witnessed the crash. She described the car as, “Swerving violently and unable maintain a straight line.” Haines supposedly attempted to get the attention of the driver and was unsuccessful. The defense on numerous times tried to blame the crime on Haynes.

Urban Rhodes The bartender for the night of the crash, Urban Rhodes, testified to “save his business.” He said that those involved where in fact not intoxicated but fully capable of their wits. The defense had to tackle the implicit bias of Urban Rhodes during the case. The defense used Rhodes to illustrate the unreliability of the bar receipt as evidence. Urban Rhodes played a vital part for the defense during the course of this trial.

Taylor Belanger Taylor Belanger, friend to Cameron Shepard and Chassidy Barnes, testified to save his friend from impending doom towards a jail sentence. Belanger testified to blame Imani Haynes for the incident. He describes Haynes as, “An elderly woman who was frantic and was like screaming into their phone.”  Belanger continued to fight for his friend in both cases.

                         

Dr. Sidney Tate The defense called to the stand Dr. Sidney Tate, who was recognized as an expert of traffic safety and science.

“I have a dual bachelor in science and chemistry, as well as a PhD in education,” Tate said.

Doctor Tate testified as in his opinion for the fatal accident and gave calculations to back his testament. Tate used the Winmark formula as well as the elapsed time to obtain his conclusion.

“I have come to a conclusion that Mr. Shepard had a blood alcohol concentration of 0.06,” Tate said, which would make Shepard legal to drive home that night. Dr. Tate ruled that Cameron Shepard is not guilty.

Both judges deliberated and remained unbiased throughout the trial and did the best of their abilities to give a fair verdict .

2022-08-16T06:29:46-05:00January 26th, 2019|Uncategorized|0 Comments

PHOTO ESSAY: A Day in Court Y&G 2019

By Kyeler Smith

Prosecutor of Amani Hayes

Prosecutor from county court in live action of questioning  Amani Hayes in the courtroom asking “where were you going the night of the crime”

Judges getting ready for another case

The judges of Amani Hayes case preparing for the trial to start and the delegates in the room to stand for their roles in the case. This was right before the judges asked “stand with your right hand up and tell the truth and nothing but the truth..”

Emily speaks the truth

Emily, a 63 year old woman, is being trialed in the courtroom when asked where she was at 2am she replied with “I was craving a bacon donut”

Questioning of Emily

The judges interviewing delegates one by one, this picture was taking when Emily was on the stage and you could hear questions being asked such as “where were you the night of the crime” and “when was the last time you heard from the victim.”

Let the case begin

After rules and regulations are listed, the courtrooms judge goes over a few more questions asked by the delegates before the trial begins.”any questions before we start?”

Fatality revealed

The delegates are being informed of what’s going on in the case, this is how they respond when they are told by the judge “3 victims involved in DUI wreck were listed as 2 injured and 1 dead.” In such cases you can also contact lawyer for DUI charges or you can also contact Jonesboro injury lawyers as they can help you in claiming the compensation.In case of car accidents you can also consult lawyers for car accident injuries in Ventura as they help you with legal remedy. In such situations, it is best to contact reliable lawyers like the experienced Christian Lawyers practicing in Tulsa to give legal counseling and help you out.

“Bloodwork”

Judges question the nurse of who drew blood of the victim, where she states “there was a substantial amount of alcohol in the blood from him.” Do hire personal injury lawyers to avoid any cases regarding this person’s health.

Locked in

A YMCA volunteer is very focused on what he is doing while providing for the courtroom. He was asked questions by media after trial and stated many times “he loves what he does and he wouldn’t want it to be anyway else.”

First call for help

As stated by the lawyers from Kirsch Daskas Law Group, Josh was the first policeman on the scene of the crime. He’s answers the question of when he was on the scene and he answered with “he got there before any other officer, and he was ready to take on any challenge brought to him.”

I solemnly swear

Delegates were asked to stand by the judges, and they replied with “yes” over all and “they were to be truthful and 100 percent through the whole trial.”

2022-08-13T02:24:50-05:00January 26th, 2019|Uncategorized|0 Comments

PHOTO ESSAY: 2019 Texas Youth and Government State Affairs Forum

By Hannah Palacios

Greta Romero and Amanpreet Chahal preparing for their State Affairs Forum proposal on banning private prisons. Both are first year participants from the Forth Worth delegation who seek to convince other delegates that the criminal justice system needs immediate reform especially in the area of for profit private prisons.

Delegate Benjamin Tolson answering non debatable questions on his proposal to stop drug smuggling in the South Texas border. Tolson faced Con speakers that doubted his proposal but Tolson managed to remain firm and was able to defend his proposal through evidence.

Delegate Faith Harlan presented her proposal against discrimination based on sexuality in the workplace. Harlan brought evidence from two well known universities across the nation including the the University of California Berkeley and the University of Texas at Austin demonstrating that LGBT discrimination is at a high rate not only in the workplace but also in their daily lives.

         “LGBT rights matter, “ saod delegate Olivia Olatunji, as she gives her pro speech against discrimination on the LGBT community in the workplace. This delegate made it clear that she supports the need for greater consequences to those who break the basic human rights of those in the LGBT community.

“One step closer to equality,” Ashley Calderon said, as she presents her proposal towards banning LGBT discrimination in the workplace. Calderon made it clear that although she might not be able to change people’s mind she knows that “little by little she will one day.”

Delegate Moises Garza presenting his proposal on tackling the growing concerns of obesity rates in Texas. Garza demonstrated his key concerns regarding the rising rate of obesity in Texas. He also gave ways of providing aid for this dire situation. Though he faced some cons he remained determined to provide concise facts and examples to bring more awareness to this matter.

Delegates asking non-debatable questions for Greta Romero and Amanpreet Chahal’s proposal on banning private prisons. Many delegates were concerned on where the funding would come from for the prisons and others were concerned on how the prisoners would be transported from prison to prison.

Delegates  Zach Plyer, Amr Kinnare and Kaza Nawrocki are shown presenting their proposal on space exploration and the creation of the Space Force. Many delegates seemed to be hesitant about the idea, but the Author’s managed to convince the delegates in the chamber.

       Chairwoman Garza and clerk Callaway aiding in the presentation of proposals. Though chairman Nsofor had to leave early due to a meeting in the Capitol, Garza stepped up and took his place.

    Delegates Greta Romero and Amanpreet Chahal are seen presenting their proposal on banning for profit private prisons. With their use of evidence supporting the problems that arise with the privatization of prisons, these two delegates captivated the audience.

2019-01-26T09:08:57-06:00January 26th, 2019|Uncategorized|0 Comments

PHOTO ESSAY: 2019 Texas Youth and Government: State Affairs Forum

by Francisco Rios on January 25. 2019

Chairman Diomarvellous Nsofor shown above (Right)  giving opening remarks and last minute reminders about parliamentary procedures to the delegates as they prepare to put the first proposal on for debate. Chairman Nsofor later had to leave the chamber to the Capitol for a meeting passing on the gavel to Chairwoman Garza .  

Today’s

TOP STORIES

Two Delegates from Duncanville proposed various solutions to address this growing problem. One of the solutions was establishing a 10:1 ratio of fast food restaurants and convenient stores to grocery stores, helping to stop low income neighborhoods from being exposed to more unhealthy eating habits.

Delegate Pranva Ganta is seen scoring the first proposal in his chamber after previously giving a con Speech over the proposal. This Year State Affairs received a new and improved scoring ballot that is set to be clear, concise and attempts to prevent biases when it comes to scoring. This year the ballot scores on how and with what the author presents their proposal.

Isabella Nieto showed strong support towards Sheridyn Campos and Nirupama Balaji’s “Mental Health In School” proposal while giving her Pro Speech. Delegate Nieto expressed the the importance of mental health in education after stating that, “1 in 5 students suffer from a mental illness”. The Author’s Proposal called for the establishment of a “Mental Health Awareness Week” that would allow students to reflect and learn about certain illnesses.

Delegates Ashley Calderon and Faith Harlan are shown above giving their proposal hoping to ban discrimination based on sexual orientation in the workplace. These two delegates from the Fort Worth delegation moved the audience with their compelling proposal, especially after delegate Olivia Olatunji said, “LGBT rights matter.”

Delegate Moises Garza is seen participating in a round of non-debatable questions with delegates Greta Romero and Amanpreet Chahal in which they call for the banning for-profit prisons. Delegate Garza questioned on the process on how the prisons will become deprivatized. The both authors later addressed Garza’s concerns in their closing summation.

After Delegates Zach Plyer, Amr Kinnare and Kaza Nawrocki presented their proposal over the Spaceforce which called for the creation of a sixth branch of the military which would “absorb” the duties of NASA including space exploration. Kristin Kamarinos (Center) stated in her Con speech that Texas should not fund this program and should keep the duties of space exploration at a local level as she herself does in her her own school under a NASA high school program.

Delegate Crowl (Left) and Delegate Ganta (Right) presented a strong proposal this afternoon regarding the action of reforming Texas Health care. Delegate Crowl in his opening remarks stated that California has double our population, yet 95 percent of their population has health care insurance. Both delegates from Midland, Texas are asking the state of Texas to operate using a two-tier system in which the government supplies the legal citizens with fundamental healthcare.

Delegate Nikash Harapanahalli addressed his concerns in his chamber over the practice of conversion therapy in a very emotional way. Harapanahalli called immediate state mandated closure of all state licensed facilities known to be be practicing conversion therapy openly. Harapanahalli later went on to say in his closing remarks, “Each and everyone of us is entitled to a happy life.”

The State Affairs delegates definitely displayed moments of seriousness, emotion and laughter. Overall, today delegates’ hard work paid off and was very evident in the proposals they presented.

READ MORE ON OUR WEBSITE

 

3208 Red River St, Austin, TX 78705

2019-01-26T09:49:55-06:00January 26th, 2019|Uncategorized|0 Comments

PHOTO ESSAY: A Day in The U.S. Federal Courthouse (Judicial Appellate)

By Emiliano Hernandez

Delegates in the Judicial Appellate are getting their last-minute preparation in the United States Federal Courthouse before the competition starts. Two of the delegates brought their portfolios ready for their cases for them to be ready for anything that comes in their way. As the day begins, the learning does too.

Our student judge is making sure that what is being presented towards him is something that is reasonable.

“Isn’t there already a law that already prevents blood draw to check for drugs in the body?”

 He needs to understand everything that is being presented, to him in order for him to make the right decision at the end with the best outcomes.

Our senior student delegate is presenting her argument in a case which involves determining what is right and wrong in a crime scene and how one can be rightfully justified. After discussing what was happening with an officer testifying to a crime in which he was involved, the delegates took the case a little bit further to the prisoner’s case, and that the judge may also have a fault in this. “Why did the judge make the error in his decision, this may be based on the judge’s leniency, which makes the argument a cloudy one.”

Our current running Youth Governor in action working in the Judicial Appellate. In his campaign rally, he said he is one of us, and he shows this as he works with us in helping delegates in the judicial appellate.

Our fellow delegates are taking notes about what is being presented in order to confront it with some strong comebacks, in which they find faults in the opposing team’s presentation. At the end of the first round, they both felt good in how they did, but at the same time, they both felt there is still some improvement to be done. As they were complimenting each other, “I felt like you did good with everything and the pressure of the questions, but I feel like I could do better in my speech.”

Two of our student judges are working together in order to come out with a good outcome of what is being presented in the fairest way. In their cases, they also had to come up with their argument in order to know if the case and the argument have good justification. “The video gained more probable cause than what was said before or what was said before or not shown in the crime scene, accumulating what may have happened in the crime scene.

Senior attorneys from  wh Law practicing in North Little Rock is presenting a very compelling argument where both the judge and the delegate are presenting strong counterpoints. Both delegates are debating what is right and about what happened, “There were 3 minutes from the video evidence missing, so how do we know if his persecution or arrest was justifiably right.” As the delegate remarks, “So this means that the officer’s statement on the case is not important?” 

Delegates multitasking during a lunch break, in which they are eating and deliberating about their cases, without wasting any time. As one of the delegates comes to this fellow judge for advice, he gives her a few tips. “Say what you need to say quickly and diligently, where everyone can understand and have your facts at hand in order to make a good compelling argument.” They later talked about how the political system works while taking notes about what is happening and preparing for round three.

Teacher inspires and motivates the fellow delegates for them to do their best, have fun, and most importantly learn. Texas Youth and Government is not only about the students in it, but the adults and staff that make it happen. “All of this, take advantage of, have fun because with the fun you learn something, and at the end of the day, we all win!”

After the lunch break, delegates are coming back hard at it in round three, with strong arguments for their cases. This fellow delegate talks about how laws being made today are being reinforced now, by answering the student judge’s question. “How do you think this case and argument may help others types of cases like this in the future?” asks the Judge. “This case will help other cases like this by keeping the evidence instead of the demolition of it, which will help innocent people, and help us see cases clearer so we can make the right decision more frequently,” replies the delegate. Our Youth and Government students and delegates are not only thinking of what happened yesterday and what is going on now but in how we can make the future the best it can be wit al the right decisions.

2022-08-09T04:15:09-05:00January 26th, 2019|Uncategorized|0 Comments

PHOTO ESSAY: House State Conference

By Alison Torres

Debating a bill that would require the government to fund safe sex education in mental institutions, delegate Ronnie Burns asks bill author Kevin Tom, “Why not have safe sex education in school instead of mental institutions?” Tom was unable to reply.

“Will grocery stores be providing reusable bags to low income families who may not be able to afford one?”said delegate Kate Carpenter to bill author Denisse Viera about her plastic free bill.

“No, they’ll have to buy their own reusable bags or pay the 25 cent fee for the plastic ones, the reusable bags will be better in the long run for both the plant and our pockets,” said Viera.

Delegate Aaron Adair preparing to speak on the house floor regarding a bill preserving monuments of the American Civil war.

“Do you believe that the Texas Government should commemorate those who are on the wrong side of history?” said elegate Lesleigh Taylor to pro speaker Alfredo Acuna conserning a bill that would perserve monuments from the American Civil War.

“They may be on the wrong side of history, but we can’t forget that they’re apart of Texas History as well,” Acuna said.

“Once again I believe the amendments relating to penalties have shown that there are people who wish to see this bill passed, thank you, but once again I cannot support this amendment.” The house votes on the amendment and it is not adopted,” said Angel Prado, responding to an amendment.

Sarah Kelly questions the proponent speaker.

“Would you agree that keeping monuments up in public places will be honoring that event in history?” said Sarah Kelly.

Bill author Eric Li is presenting his opening statement for his bill regarding increasing the requirements for ownership of firearms.

“First change the legal age of owning a firearm to 21 years old, you will require psychological evaluations every 2 years, background checks,” Li said.

Delegate Nickolas Horn presents an amendment to remove provision “A,” which changes the legal age for ownership of a firearm to 21 years old.

“This provision doesn’t make much sense,” Horn said. “People are allowed to go to war and use guns at the age of 18, I shouldn’t be allowed to go to war but come home and not be able to buy a gun.”

Delegates of the House are voting to pass the bill that states “an act to increase requirements for ownership of firearms.” The house passes the bill.

A delegate asked bill author Hannah Le, “What are the guidelines for the speakers coming to the schools?”

“As shown in my bill the speaker will need to have 5 or more years of experience speaking to groups of 500 or more, they will also be required to give out pamphlets to the students,” Le said.

2019-01-26T08:52:51-06:00January 26th, 2019|Uncategorized|0 Comments

PHOTO ESSAY: Outlook on State Affairs

By Adriana Contreras

A series of photos which goal is to show and tell the story of what happens inside the State Affair committee room walls with insights of delegates proposals and SAF evaluators.

 

State affairs: Bus shuttle on it’s way to First United Methodists Church

Delegate Moses Garza, excited to attend his first state conference and ready to face this busy weekend head on, was going over his proposal on obesity rates in Texas. On his way to First United Methodist Church, he wrote down the key points of his speech. This includes statistics such as “approximately 70% of adults are overweight or obese” and how his plan of action is “to establish a supermarket or any source of fresh food in areas with populations of 3,200 and up.”

 

State affairs:

Diomarvellous Nsfor is the State affair Forum Chair with the role  his role of being the chairman for committee room 100 as a chair he monitors the delegates to follow with their roles. Not only does he “uphold parliament to the highest but he upholds their time to be fair “ as they all have dedicated time and effort into what they do .

 

State affairs : Regulating the sales of arsenal weapons

Delegate Cayla Barlow reads over her flash cards and is ready to present her proposal that she explains she is very passionate about. The proposal is about how The United States should regulate their sales on Arsenal weapons due to the recent school shootings that have been happening. Her goals are to make the process of getting guns harder and to raise the age to obtain weapons to 21. She believes, “America should go for this as we need to change on the gun laws , cause if we keep this reoccurring problem going when will we ever put a stop to it”.

 

State affairs : Chairman Garcia & Clerk Salazar

Matthew Garcia & Oscar Salazar from Oak cliff delegation share their experiences as Chair and clerk. Matthew states that He’s been chairing since last year for SAF and in his opinion chairing has been magical beacuse those “busy active times where everyone is debating makes [him] want to continue chairing in the future.”

On the other hand for Oscar, Clerking is stressful “it’s a great experience and helps you in your multitasking skills because, though the chair looks to have the control, the clerk is a big part of it; “it’s the backbone of the room with a bit more responsibilities.” He later adds that though stressful he wants to continue clerking for SAF .

 

State affairs: Privatization of health care

Delegate Noah Busbee proposal was supporting the privatization of health care and the expansion of local markets to provide both people who are uninsured and suffering from low quality income. As Noah states, “Socialism is really bad,” which in his perspective was simple and cut to the point for his proposal in order to be a compelling statement. The main con for this proposal was the deregulation of the market and the fact that this would allow private companies to decide the quality of care that these people would receive.

 

State affairs: Evaluator Natalie Thomas

Natalie Thomas, a college Staff and old YG delegate, was the evaluator for room 101. This was Natalie’s first time evaluating and she goes to say that she enjoyed it because “students are very passionate about what they work on and you can tell with the way they present their proposal and questions.” Evaluating has been a fun experience for her, she explained, and, she would definitely do it again in the future .

 

State affairs: YAG is for friendships

Emma Brunk from Moody Family & Ahmad Crawford from the Barack Obama academy in a slight moment during the evaluating period were having a conversation which led to a friendship. They both agree that Youth & Government’s best attributes are the easy to form friendships which happen in a moment and last a lifetime.

State affairs: Include all administrative water districts into Texas HB 1648

Delegate Madison Irvin Richardson with her proposal which is to included all administrative water districts into Texas HB 1648 where the goal is to “grow, expand and improve our water districts.” One delegate who was appointed to speak for con broought up that the proposal is “a great idea but an even greater of a plan to enforce.”

 

State affairs: Banning For-profit prisons

Delegates Sarah Gianotti and Luke Jamil present their proposal to band for-profit prisons due to their explained unethical behavior. They are wanting to phase out private prisons and make them public. A  major factor in their proposal was that this change would lower crime rate since “the main goal of imprisoning individuals should be for rehabilitation.” Allowing the government to contract private prisons which operate with the goal of making money, is “a step backwards in the pursuit of achieving a fully rehabilitation based system.”

 

State affairs: Evaluator Philip Mccarthy

Evaluator Philip McCarthy from Episcopal High School explains that he is very impressed with the State Affair Delegates . He said that, “they are really good at what they do; they are very well informed, whatever you throw at them they will catch it.” He spoke very highly about all delegates and explains that he likes evaluating because of this.

 

2019-01-26T08:44:49-06:00January 26th, 2019|Uncategorized|0 Comments

Student Delegates Proves Mock Legislation Is No Joke

By Qandeel Suleman

In the John H. Reagan Building, the Hyde Senate reviewed and discussed bills written by delegates over various topics, from adding a personal finance class to creating prerequisites to obtain a license for firearms. 

Each bill author was asked questions for a short time period in order to clarify their bill and discuss the purpose of it with their fellow delegates. Afterward, amendments are put forth to improve the original bill and finally, the delegates make a speech of whether they support or oppose the bill. In the end, the bill is voted for due passage, and when it is by the agreeance of “aye’s” it will be sent to the House for further voting.

The delegates in the Hyde Senate were very serious in terms of how they handled situations and how they were towards the process of presenting and passing bills. It was very obvious how intrigued the delegates were by the questions, bills, and amendments, along with how important it was to follow the rules and provide insightful thoughts. Many of the delegates were able to voice their opinions especially on controversial topics of gun violence.

Throughout the process, especially the period of questions, the passion of legislation along with creating and revising bills was vividly present in the way the delegates quickly stood up to ask a question. Moreover, in the amendment and pro/con periods, the delegates had clearly put a lot of time, effort, and thought into saying what they believe is right.

During the ten-minute recess, conversation with some of the delegates of the Hyde Senate gave insight into their experiences. It was many of their first time at state, while some had just switched to legislative this year.

Some delegates, such as Summi Man, believed legislative “would be fun and relevant to current society.”

As a part of the Hyde Senate, or any section of the legislation, each delegate is able to gain new skills and improve on those they already have. From communication skills to being creative and coming up with things on the spot.

2019-01-25T17:50:15-06:00January 25th, 2019|Uncategorized|0 Comments

Texas Youth and Government is a Catalyst for Student Leadership

By: Noor Mohamed

Hundreds of students from different regions annually attend the Texas Youth and Government Conference (TXYG) in hopes of meeting new people, being challenged and diving deep in self-development.

Adaelaide Zink (Sophomore), Isabell Bannerot (Sophomore), Chris Fryamn (Freshman), and Matthew Lynn (Freshman) all in Appellate Court from Christain Life Preparatory shared their insight from the past couple of year they’ve been involved at TXYG.

There are a couple aspects to developing student leaders. First, they need to play with concrete ideas and topics to better develop the world around them. Second, they need to practice the skills necessary to conduct formal and scholarly dialogue with each other. Lastly, you set them loose and let them run the world.

However, every journey must start somewhere and for most it’s in their respective sections at TXYG.

For Fryamn, his growth starts out in the courtroom of his Appellate trial. “It helps you think on your feet. You get to think of what you want to say, consider what you’ve written and invest new things.”

“I think development in speech which is an important life skill to be able to convey yourself eloquently to others,” said Lynn when sharing how he’s seen his own transformation on the first day of his second conference.

Alongside coming from varying regions, the hundreds of students at the annual conference all come bearing extremely different personalities.

Zink said “When I started TXYG in 7th grade, I hated public speaking, but now I really enjoy it. This program has really taught me how to think logically and be comfortable in large groups.”

Bannerot shared she expresses herself better through works and commented how “YG for me, especially Appellate Court, has helped me with being able to write concisely and powerfully to express my ideas in a way that makes sense to myself and everyone else.”

Interestingly enough, not everyone walks away from the annual conference changed from proposal debates and ready to be politicians. For others, the real change happens when overcoming personal challenges.

“As an introvert YG has been really helpful in boosting my confidence. Debating in YG is a lot different than talking to regular people, but it has helped my speaking skills in my everyday conversations— something that most people overlook, “ said Bannerot.

Although the conference may be short, the days are definitely long, but the Christian Life Preparatory students shared their most memorable and pivotal moments through the program.

Reliving the thrill of it all, Fryamn said “When someone gets up there round one of Appellate Court, you’re like ‘Oh my God, I’m in it!’ You’re thrown head first in the questioning, but in the end it helps you be a better quick thinker and you don’t notice at first how many new skills you start to develop.”

A common theme amongst most sections is the sense of leadership through self-advocacy as student defend their own ideas as well as through the art of duality as they’re challenged to view all aspects from different perspectives.

At the end of the week, as these students pack their bags to go home they’re packing in the new sense of leadership they’ve unfolded over the past few days.

By immersing students in portraying real-life roles, giving them positions of power and fine-tuning their skills, once they leave the walls of the Texas Youth and Government conference the real world is now their playing ground to enact any change they seem fit.

2019-01-25T17:41:46-06:00January 25th, 2019|Uncategorized|0 Comments
Go to Top