Volunteer with us Today!! We have various dates to choose from Jan 31st | Feb 1st | Feb 27th | Feb 28th | Mar 1st | Sign Up Today!

Uncategorized

Student Delegates Proves Mock Legislation Is No Joke

By Qandeel Suleman

In the John H. Reagan Building, the Hyde Senate reviewed and discussed bills written by delegates over various topics, from adding a personal finance class to creating prerequisites to obtain a license for firearms. 

Each bill author was asked questions for a short time period in order to clarify their bill and discuss the purpose of it with their fellow delegates. Afterward, amendments are put forth to improve the original bill and finally, the delegates make a speech of whether they support or oppose the bill. In the end, the bill is voted for due passage, and when it is by the agreeance of “aye’s” it will be sent to the House for further voting.

The delegates in the Hyde Senate were very serious in terms of how they handled situations and how they were towards the process of presenting and passing bills. It was very obvious how intrigued the delegates were by the questions, bills, and amendments, along with how important it was to follow the rules and provide insightful thoughts. Many of the delegates were able to voice their opinions especially on controversial topics of gun violence.

Throughout the process, especially the period of questions, the passion of legislation along with creating and revising bills was vividly present in the way the delegates quickly stood up to ask a question. Moreover, in the amendment and pro/con periods, the delegates had clearly put a lot of time, effort, and thought into saying what they believe is right.

During the ten-minute recess, conversation with some of the delegates of the Hyde Senate gave insight into their experiences. It was many of their first time at state, while some had just switched to legislative this year.

Some delegates, such as Summi Man, believed legislative “would be fun and relevant to current society.”

As a part of the Hyde Senate, or any section of the legislation, each delegate is able to gain new skills and improve on those they already have. From communication skills to being creative and coming up with things on the spot.

2019-01-25T17:50:15-06:00January 25th, 2019|Uncategorized|0 Comments

Texas Youth and Government is a Catalyst for Student Leadership

By: Noor Mohamed

Hundreds of students from different regions annually attend the Texas Youth and Government Conference (TXYG) in hopes of meeting new people, being challenged and diving deep in self-development.

Adaelaide Zink (Sophomore), Isabell Bannerot (Sophomore), Chris Fryamn (Freshman), and Matthew Lynn (Freshman) all in Appellate Court from Christain Life Preparatory shared their insight from the past couple of year they’ve been involved at TXYG.

There are a couple aspects to developing student leaders. First, they need to play with concrete ideas and topics to better develop the world around them. Second, they need to practice the skills necessary to conduct formal and scholarly dialogue with each other. Lastly, you set them loose and let them run the world.

However, every journey must start somewhere and for most it’s in their respective sections at TXYG.

For Fryamn, his growth starts out in the courtroom of his Appellate trial. “It helps you think on your feet. You get to think of what you want to say, consider what you’ve written and invest new things.”

“I think development in speech which is an important life skill to be able to convey yourself eloquently to others,” said Lynn when sharing how he’s seen his own transformation on the first day of his second conference.

Alongside coming from varying regions, the hundreds of students at the annual conference all come bearing extremely different personalities.

Zink said “When I started TXYG in 7th grade, I hated public speaking, but now I really enjoy it. This program has really taught me how to think logically and be comfortable in large groups.”

Bannerot shared she expresses herself better through works and commented how “YG for me, especially Appellate Court, has helped me with being able to write concisely and powerfully to express my ideas in a way that makes sense to myself and everyone else.”

Interestingly enough, not everyone walks away from the annual conference changed from proposal debates and ready to be politicians. For others, the real change happens when overcoming personal challenges.

“As an introvert YG has been really helpful in boosting my confidence. Debating in YG is a lot different than talking to regular people, but it has helped my speaking skills in my everyday conversations— something that most people overlook, “ said Bannerot.

Although the conference may be short, the days are definitely long, but the Christian Life Preparatory students shared their most memorable and pivotal moments through the program.

Reliving the thrill of it all, Fryamn said “When someone gets up there round one of Appellate Court, you’re like ‘Oh my God, I’m in it!’ You’re thrown head first in the questioning, but in the end it helps you be a better quick thinker and you don’t notice at first how many new skills you start to develop.”

A common theme amongst most sections is the sense of leadership through self-advocacy as student defend their own ideas as well as through the art of duality as they’re challenged to view all aspects from different perspectives.

At the end of the week, as these students pack their bags to go home they’re packing in the new sense of leadership they’ve unfolded over the past few days.

By immersing students in portraying real-life roles, giving them positions of power and fine-tuning their skills, once they leave the walls of the Texas Youth and Government conference the real world is now their playing ground to enact any change they seem fit.

2019-01-25T17:41:46-06:00January 25th, 2019|Uncategorized|0 Comments

Opinion: Can Business Clothes Impact Your Debating Skills?

By: Auyana Aird

Dressed up in a suit and tie, dress or skirt, anxious to present your bill on the house floor or to ask a prominent question to continue the intensive debate. Could part of the delegates capability in being a strong debater correlate with the clothes you wear on your body?  Youth government is a mock representation of the real world, but what if it consisted of no prominent dress code which means casual rather than business attire?

“Dressing in casual clothes could ruin the atmosphere or formality of debating.” Delegate Edwin Ling from Vic Coppinger YMCA said.

In Youth and Government, the way you dress is a major factor of believability, respectability, or getting the attention from other delegates minds and ears tuned in on what you believe in. You can tell a lot about a delegate just by what they have on their backs.

“If you are dressed informally, then people will judge you in a way, and won’t respect you as much as if you were dressed properly.” Delegate Sravan Mugada from Plano YMCA said.

Debating on the house floor requires focus, stability, engagement and many other factors. Wearing business attire stabilizes a form of professionalism that is needed and required in the government world.

“Dressing professionally is wearing clothes that represent your best self. These clothes are something that would be appropriate in debate,” Delegate Lesleigh Taylor from Oak Cliff YMCA said.

While wearing casual clothes on the house floor is not permitted, what if delegates could wear casual clothes? New research shows it actually impacts how you think. Professional dress, one study found, increases abstract thinking and gives people a broader perspective.

“Casual clothes on the house floor would be a more relaxed environment, maybe people would be a little less competitive about who is going to speak next and not be so focused on winning.” Delegate Lesleigh Taylor said.

The way you dress affects your performance and how others judge your performance.

So choose your personal presentation with care. The presentation includes not only your clothes, but your accessories, hairstyle, fragrance, posture, body language, tone of voice, and the level of energy with which you move and speak. Think of the person that you need to be in any particular situation.

2019-01-26T10:52:17-06:00January 25th, 2019|Uncategorized|0 Comments

The State of Texas Government House Chambers vs. Texas Youth Government based House Chambers

By Auyana Aird

Over 50 delegates on the House floor, get the opportunity to get real work experience on what the State of Texas Government would be like.

In real life, the process is somewhat different. The House Chambers in legislature meet in a regular legislative session in Austin every two years. By statute, the legislature convenes in a regular session on the second Tuesday in January of every odd-numbered year. These sessions are limited to 140-day duration. The constitution also allows the governor to call additional special sessions as necessary. During a called session, which cannot exceed 30 days, the legislature may consider legislation only on matters specified in proclamations.

“I like that I get to hear many different opinions, and that we all could speak about one thing but it does take forever to get it done.” Delegate Charis Maxwell from Hood County YMCA said

In the environment at the Youth Government, the House chambers has a process that is unique. The lobbyists select a number of bills they want on the docket, then the speaker then picks the ones he or she wants to be presented to the floor. The bill authors will then present, then the assorted members of the house will come and debate the bills put forth.

The Speaker of the House in both Youth government and State government is prominently the same. The speaker is the presiding officer of the House of Representatives. The Texas Constitution requires the House of Representatives, each time a new legislature convenes, to choose one of its own members to serve as speaker.

As presiding officer, the speaker maintains order during floor debate, recognizes legislators who wish to speak, and rules on procedural matters. The constitution also requires the speaker to sign all bills and joint resolutions passed by the legislature. As a member of the House of Representatives, the speaker may vote on all questions before the house.

“The house floor is very competitive, when I walk on the house floor I know I’m going to get competition, it is straight to the point and I love all the intelligent minds in the house.” Delegate Mouctar Diallo from Oak Cliff YMCA said.

Both State of Texas youth and government House Chambers and the Official Texas Youth and Government is not much different than you think.

2019-01-25T17:19:34-06:00January 25th, 2019|Uncategorized|0 Comments

Farabee Senate Passes Bill Prohibiting the Removal of Confederate Monuments

By: Christina van Waasbergen

The Farabee Senate passed a bill on Friday prohibiting the removal of Civil War Monuments (including those honoring the Confederacy) from public land.

Josie Woodward, a senior from Liberty High School who spoke against the bill, believes that Confederate monuments should be removed because they are racist. “I think that statues and monuments should be things to honor things that had positive impacts and I think that it is doing nothing but giving racism and bigotry a platform that it shouldn’t have,” Woodward said in an interview.

David Poe, a senior from Liberty High School, spoke in favor of the bill. Poe said in an interview that he believes that those who wish to remove Confederate monuments are the intolerant ones. “These statues have been here a long time and it’s only because the issue of race has gotten a lot of attention in the last few decades and tensions are really heating up between different groups, some of which want to remove the statues, and I feel like these groups are simply impulsively removing these statues and not giving the other groups a chance to respond  and just hastily getting rid of everything that they see unfit, which is the very definition of intolerance,” Poe said.

The bill will now be sent to the governor for approval.

 

2019-01-25T17:09:58-06:00January 25th, 2019|Uncategorized|0 Comments

Farabee Senate Declines to Pass Bill Cracking Down on Payday Lenders

By: Christina van Waasbergen

The Farabee Senate failed a bill on Friday limiting the interest rates that payday lenders can charge for loans.

Payday loans are a type of short-term money borrowing where a person borrows a small amount of money at a high-interest rate. This can lead to the borrower becoming trapped in a cycle of debt. This bill attempted to solve this problem by mandating a maximum annual interest rate of 50% for unsecured loans (loans not requiring collateral) issued by payday lenders that have a duration of less than thirty-one days.

The bill’s author, Bill Tang, a senior from Glenda Dawson High School, argued that payday loans prey on those with low incomes. “Payday lending services essentially profit off of misery,” Tang said in an interview. “If you were to perhaps go to a city such as Houston, you’ll find that most of these payday lending centers center around poorer districts around the city, and the reason why is because they target these poor individuals.”

Tang also said that payday lenders trap borrowers in debt but it is easy to find a lawyer for filing bankruptcy and to resolve this issue as soon as possible. “It’s counted on that they won’t be able to pay back their loans, and that they will take out more loans from the company, and it will force them further and further into debt because they take out more money to pay back their old loans,” Tang said.

Anastasia Sotiropoulos, a senior from The Episcopal School of Dallas, spoke against the bill. Sotiropoulos said in an interview that she believes that payday lenders should be able to charge as much interest as they want in order to stay afloat. “That’s just the way that capitalism works,” Sotiropoulos said. “Although it may be unfortunate for people who have to pay a high-interest rate, they are agreeing to it, so as long as the person agrees to it, and it’s like a consensual contract, I think that it should be allowed.”

Sotiropoulos said that there are better ways to fix the problem of predatory payday lending. “If we could make people more financially literate, that would be helpful,” she said.

       

2022-08-09T00:18:58-05:00January 25th, 2019|Uncategorized|0 Comments

Delegate Advocates for Homeless Population

By Sarah Roy

Student from Cleburne High School, Tabitha Lane, attended the Youth and Government State Conference where she presented her legislative bill addressing the lack of rights and immoral criminalization of the homeless population. She found faults in how homeless people are treated and segregated from the rest of society based on their quality of life and took to this perspective when creating her bill months prior. Through the presentation of her bill, she expressed her concern over what she considered a moral dilemma while displaying her passion over the, often overlooked, issue.

Lane uncovered many concerns with the way homeless people are treated in her bill, a major concern being their lack of rights. There are laws in areas that discriminate against their quality of life, prohibiting them to panhandle and beg for money, regardless of that being their only source for income, and they are also searched and seized by officers unrightfully of their belongings, often including any form of identification, they may have. This takes away opportunities from them due to the fact that many places, such as shelters, require a form of identification at the least. Laws and treatment such as these have completely pushed them out of society, ultimately resulting in their segregation being a social normality because we as people have grown accustomed to viewing them negatively.

“It’s sickening to see that as humans we indulge in our own comfortability and completely turn a blind eye to people who live in the streets while we’re comfortable in our homes. It’s one of the most inhumane things that we do and have accepted in our society. They [homeless population] have potential just like any other person, they just don’t have the resources to obtain that,” said Lane.

Provisions were made to address this as the bill would protect the rights of homeless people to utilize any public facility as long as they commit no unlawful laws. This would include public sidewalks, public parks, public transportation and public buildings. Another provision made covered the quality of the shelters provided to the homeless. These shelters do come with barriers such as safety concerns, rules and regulations, health concerns, eligibility identification and mental health concerns.

“It’s the equivalent of sleeping on the streets, just with more cushion and as ironic as it seems, investing so much money into homeless shelters is detrimental,” stated Lane.

Lane found issues with the shelters offered because often they are not up to par for a substantial form of living and it’s also not enough to continue to provide homeless shelter after homeless shelter, especially those that only offer one night of residence, as it is not solving the issue, but rather fueling it to continue. Ideally, shelters should be providing the homeless with security to allow them the time necessary that it takes to get back on their feet.

2019-01-25T16:48:51-06:00January 25th, 2019|Uncategorized|0 Comments

A Bill to Charge Pregnant Women With Child Endangerment if They are Found to be Abusing Alcohol and/or Drugs During Their Pregnancy

By Ivan Kipp

During the Youth and Government State Conference on January, 25th, in Austin, Texas, delegate Sanjana Dandu proposed to charge pregnant women with child endangerment if they were abusing substances that are capable of doing damage to the embryo. Delegate Dandu wrote and presented the bill in the Hyde House.

Delegate Dandu stated her great concerns for the future health of unborn children. In her introduction, she said “any form of alcohol [or drug use] during pregnancy is harmful,” and that this “is a very prominent issue in Texas”. The ultimate goal of this bill is to prevent mothers from abusing substances during their pregnancy “so that way no birth effects from alcohol or drug abuse” occur. In case of emergency cases, first aid course Edinburgh need to be taken seriously and implemented at every step! 

In Section II, the bill contains a list of penalties that apply to the mother if they are found to be consuming these substances which include three punishments. The first is being charged with child endangerment, and the second penalty terminates the mother’s parental rights to the child. There are also guidelines that the hospitals have to follow also including three offenses if the hospital does not administer all tests to the pregnant women. The first will be a warning from the state to the hospital, then a cut in funding in addition to the suspension of the practician for no more than 2 weeks, and finally a forced shutdown of the hospital by the Texas Department of State Health Services.

Bill HH010 was subject to many questions concerning the custody of the children as well as other inquiries. One delegate asked, “[do the] fathers have rights to the kid or does the foster care system?”. The author replied that if there is a father or other family members able to take the child if the mother has her parental rights revoked, then they are considered first and foster care will be considered the last emergency option.

Six amendments were presented, but only one succeeded to pass. The passing amendment pushed one of the drug tests from the first trimester to the middle of the second trimester. One delegate argued in opposition to the amendment that extending the date increases the probability of disability when the child is born, but the amendment passed regardless.You can also find social security lawyers for hire if your disability is caused out of employment to claim compensation. You can find lawyers for disability cases from here and get legal advice from them. 

The delegates present were very divided on the bill. One opponent argued that the mother shouldn’t lose custody after only two failed tests, but the author stressed the importance of the safety of the unborn child. A fellow delegate for the bill said that “many babies are dying because moms are taking drugs,” and strongly encouraged the delegates to pass the bill to ensure the future health of the babies.

The bill was passed in the Hyde House on January 25th and will continue to proceed through hearings in the near future.

2022-08-25T07:25:02-05:00January 25th, 2019|Uncategorized|0 Comments

Delegate Chooses Controversial Bill

By Simone Lee

“A lot of people don’t know about this issue; they disregard it,” said Sanjana Dandu, a freshman from the legislative branch.

Her bill proposed for pregnant women to be criminally charged for knowingly using alcohol while pregnant.

“They believe actually leaving marks on a child is, well the child doesn’t necessarily have to be born yet for it to be endangered,” Dandu said.

She said that both abuse on a child when the mother is not pregnant and when that mother is, is “basically the same thing.” She added that either way the mother is still putting that child’s life in danger.

She stated that she has actually seen movies and TV shows that show the romanticization of using alcohol while being pregnant. When asked why she chose to do a bill proposal about such a controversial topic and she stated that she knew the topic was “extremely debatable” and  she “wanted to be noticed and for a freshman, make her voice more pronounced.”

“As soon as I got up to the stand I started shaking a lot, I was nervous,” Dandu said.  “I had done all this research, and I knew so much about the topic so I wasn’t completely horrified. I believe anyone can [argue a bill] it if they put the effort into the research.”

However, she did have some complaints about the legislative branch.

“I really wish we had more time for our closing remarks, it’s where you can review all your points and can defend yourself to the best of your ability,” Dandu said.

2019-01-25T16:19:15-06:00January 25th, 2019|Uncategorized|0 Comments

From Every Angle: State Affairs Delegate Experiences a Variety of Roles Within Forum

By Ava Motes

Kirby Cabler, a junior delegate from Oak Ridge High School, fulfilled two different roles within the State Affairs committee today. She first acted as a proposal author, presenting her “Mental Wellness In Schools” proposition to a chair and panel of delegates. After deliberation had concluded, propelling her proposal to further State Affairs rounds, Cabler switched to the overseeing role of a chairperson.

“A chairperson manages the debate by imposing and uphold the parliamentary procedure within a state affairs forum,” said Youth and Government (YG) officer Dio Marvellous Nsofor.

While the State Affairs Forum is most frequently associated with the work of proposal authors in addressing current issues, the role of “chairs” is vital to regulating the discussion and impact of propositions.

“They make sure that the debate is equal and fair, and that everyone gets an equal opportunity to share their own opinions,” said Nsofor, “It’s all about leadership–they have to be willing to courageously lead.”

Cabler has committed herself to embody a leader among other members of the State Affairs Forum.

“I really enjoy seeing other competitors grow and guiding them towards that growth in parliamentary procedure,” she said.

Although Cabler is impassioned about the issues she has the opportunity to discuss a proposal author, she is partial to her duties as a chairperson.

“I have been competing in debate-like settings for so long that I care less about winning than helping others get to where I am in terms of experience,” Cabler said.

Cabler has been a member of her high school debate program for three years, rising in the ranks to serve on an elite debate council. She also held an intern position with a criminal attorney in downtown Houston last summer, giving her to the opportunity to speak with clients and organize plea bargains.

“It was one of the best experiences in my life, I learned so much grew really passionate about the subject matter,” Cabler said.

As a freshman, Cabler’s high school assembled their first Youth and Government team, and though the program suited her interests, only older students were allowed to compete. However, a handful of her fellow debate members attended the YG conference and encouraged her to join in subsequent years. Due to her passion for debate and criminal law, Cabler decided to participate in mock trial as a sophomore.

“I was really excited to do mock trial, but a week before the deadline, we realized that we didn’t have enough people,” Cabler said, “I ended up moving to State Affairs kind of on a whim, but I fell in love with it.”

Cabler worked as a proposal author her first year in Youth and Government, receiving high marks at the district level.

“I proposed an extremely researched proposal about sex ed in Texas, specifically repeat teen pregnancies,” Cabler said.

However, despite her vast extent of preparation, her proposition did not advance. “I was in a room full of like-minded kids from the same district, and they didn’t agree with my ideas,” Cabler said.

This year, State Affairs presented a new system for evaluation that focuses on presentation quality as opposed to the political alignment of your proposition.

“I’m happy that I get to be a chair with this new system, because I care so much more about how much work people are putting in than what they’re saying,” Cabler said.

The new rubric prides proposition authors on their degree of preparation and presentation skills. Ranking is determined by your performance, thus mechanics and accuracy are less important than confidence.

Cabler returned as a proposal author with the intent of advocating for mental wellness training and qualifications among public school staff. Due to her proposition partner inability to attend the state conference, Cabler had to present her ideas alone in front of the panel.

“I wasn’t too worried about it because of this new evaluation system. I’m used to public speaking, and I was really confident in my ability to convey these ideas,” she said.

Her presentation was successful, and she was excited to find that she was advancing further through the State Affairs Forum than she had before.

“Doing my proposal was really fun this year, but I still don’t think anything can top chairing. I’ve begun to realize that I really love these kinds of leadership roles,” Cabler said.

The summers proceeding and following her freshman year, Cabler worked as a counselor for a youth theatre camp.

“That was when I first discovered that I love working with kids and helping them grow in things that I was passionate about,” Cabler said.

She initially worried that she would be overly critical or jealous of the children she was working with, but soon developed an affection for assisting others.

“During the district conference, I was with a lot of first-time delegates and younger competitors. I had to provide them with more of a crutch, but it was cool to know that I was helping everyone get on the same page for state [conference],” she said.

Those who have worked with Cabler have a lot of respect for her oversight and advice, especially in these scenarios.

“Kirby really knows what she’s doing. She is just a natural at everything and I loved working with her,” said Brendon Nguyen, a delegate who took note of precedence and timekeeping alongside Cabler during today’s preliminary rounds.

“I’ve been doing two really different things today, and I loved them both. I am starting to graduate on to a more leader-oriented position… [but] I think there is value in absolutely every role,” Cabler said.

Today, she has proven herself adept at a wide variety of skills from confident debate to informed guidance. As she continues through subsequent rounds, she resolves to facilitate an enjoyable experience among other delegates and advocate for the mental wellbeing of all Texas students.

2019-01-25T15:26:37-06:00January 25th, 2019|Uncategorized|0 Comments
Go to Top